With friends like these, who needs an NSA?

"Susan Rice is a fierce champion of human dignity"---Barack Obama.

If championing human dignity means lying about a terrorist attack,
belittling an entire religion by lying and claiming they were upset by a video,
lying to four military and government personnel's grieving families,
 lying on five separate morning shows about the reasoning behind the attack and never reneging on that falsehood on self-same five morning news programs,
accepting an offer to be NSA with the understanding that your appointment is unwelcome by a large proportion of military personnel and a divided nation....
No, Ms Rice the dignified person would not accept the appointment of NSA. She would bow out gracefully and go on as many news programs as possible and admit she was fed information from a misguided administration. And admit that her ability to regurgitate lies so readily for the Obama Administration does nothing but put our National Security at risk. She would also admit that having her female counterpart, HR Clinton, take all of the blame on Benghazi on her own shoulders and with that responsibility claim "what difference does it make?" is an embarassment to her gender and should be wary about being female under the Obama Administration.
As NSA Susan Rice should be aware that newsmedia is 24 hours now. Nothing is hidden. And the truth will eventually come out....
CNN obtains emails showing evidence that the White House knew of extremist claims in Benghazi attack
From CNN:
Two hours after the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, the White House, the State Department and the FBI were told that an Islamist group had claimed credit, government e-mails obtained by CNN show.
One of the e-mails - sent from a State Department address to various government agencies - specifically identifies Ansar al-Sharia as claiming responsibility for the attack on its Facebook page and on Twitter.
The e-mails raise further questions about the seeming confusion on the part of the Obama administration to determine the nature of the September attack and those who planned it.

The question is do we want a National Security Advisor who does nothing but repeat what she is told to say? Or, do we want an NSA who is well-versed in international political climates and can state unequivocally sans prompter what is going on in the world around her?